Fraudulent Blog Post Revisions

While Martin Armstrong's deliberate manipulation of past events has been documented here before, the following variant deserves the space for an individual article. He is increasingly using his Socrates private blog to evade scrutiny, and it was only a matter of time until someone discovered that he manipulates the history of his posts:

Martin Armstrong Discussion

I am so glad I happened on to this blog. I have been trying to figure out this guy’s ramblings for far too long. I got sucked in by the Forecaster movie - that’s a compelling story. I subscribed to his website and analyzed his posts (no easy feat) for the past year. I began to notice what appeared to be revisions in his historical posts to align with reality. I began to screen print his advice/predictions (no way to print otherwise) so I could compare. Yep - proved that. Have cancelled subscription.

 

Martin Armstrong quotes Forecasts  that he never made

Cases in this category are sometimes hard to check because it is inherently difficult to prove that something does not exist. The following approach helps here.

 

Armstrong knows the value of evidence, and he has gone so far as creating fake evidence that he and others can quote. He would never miss such an opportunity. If he doesn't quote it, then most likely such evidence does not exist and he never made the forecast.

But it gets worse.

In Aladdin v Socrates he wrote:

... when Socrates got the whole crash right. It picked the very day of the high in 2007 and they were calling it on the floor Armstrong’s Revenge.

Armstrong falsely claims his software forecast the day of the 2007 high. At the time, Armstrong was imprisoned for fraud. His Socrates software wasn't running and he wasn't making ANY public predictions (website not made until 2012).